MSc

MSc Quality Management

ماجستير إدارة الجودة. 6 assessed courses, 1,800 notional hours, tuition-free.

Online & New Capital Campus

4 Semesters (2 Years)180 creditsEnglish

Begin your application Explore programme

Overview

ماجستير إدارة الجودة. MSc Quality Management at Imperial University in Cairo: 6 assessed courses, 180 credits and 1,800 notional learning hours, at 10 hours per credit. The hours on each course add up to that total. The award is fully online. There is no campus to attend. MSc Quality Management is taught as one award, not a list of unrelated modules. The published length is 4 Semesters (2 Years), and the credit total is 180. Students move from The working week in Quality Management through The working week in Quality Management; Evidence in Quality Management; The system around Quality Management; Rules that bind Quality Management; A manager's brief in Quality Management; Capstone in Quality Management, and finish on Capstone in Quality Management. Each course has a question, a method, and a submission. In this field, students diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation. Reading is a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. The artefact a marker expects is a consulting brief a manager could use. The award is built so that a graduate can do the following in practice: Produce a professional file in Quality Management Choose a method and write what the evidence cannot support Keep a record a third party can review Teaching assumes the student can read a source, attempt a problem before the seminar, and revise after feedback. Attendance at live seminars is part of the design. The capstone or final course must use the methods of the earlier courses; a project that ignores them does not pass. The pages for each course name the topics that are examined. Those topics are the syllabus. A brochure line is not a substitute for them.

Each credit is 10 notional learning hours. The courses add up to 180 credits and 1,800 hours.

Who This Programme Is For

People already working around Quality Management
Career-changers who can study without leaving their city
Teams who need a file they can review, not a slogan

Faculty spotlight

Imperial University in Cairo supervises the courses and the final assessed file. Supervision is assigned from the school that owns the award.

How you can study

Digital only

Study online

100% tuition-free online

Online tuition is completely free. Study from anywhere in Egypt, the Arab region, and worldwide with full digital flexibility.

✦ Tuition: £0 / $0
✦ Examinations are free. There is no exam fee.
✦ Learn from anywhere · Live online seminars

Apply online →

What You Will Learn

Produce a professional file in Quality Management
Choose a method and write what the evidence cannot support
Keep a record a third party can review
State the limit of the award
Submit the final project inside the published hours

Curriculum

Stage 1 — 900 hours

Code	Course	Credits · hours
SUDCL01	The working week in Quality Management The working week in Quality Management (SUDCL01) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using The working week in Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. SUDCL01-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — The working week in Quality Management SUDCL01-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — The working week in Quality Management SUDCL01-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — The working week in Quality Management SUDCL01-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — The working week in Quality Management SUDCL01-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — The working week in Quality Management SUDCL01-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — The working week in Quality Management	30 · 300 h
SV7BE02	Evidence in Quality Management Evidence in Quality Management (SV7BE02) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using Evidence in Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. SV7BE02-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — Evidence in Quality Management SV7BE02-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — Evidence in Quality Management SV7BE02-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — Evidence in Quality Management SV7BE02-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — Evidence in Quality Management SV7BE02-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — Evidence in Quality Management SV7BE02-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — Evidence in Quality Management	30 · 300 h
SUXBT03	The system around Quality Management The system around Quality Management (SUXBT03) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using The system around Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. SUXBT03-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — The system around Quality Management SUXBT03-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — The system around Quality Management SUXBT03-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — The system around Quality Management SUXBT03-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — The system around Quality Management SUXBT03-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — The system around Quality Management SUXBT03-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — The system around Quality Management	30 · 300 h

Code

Course

Credits · hours

SUDCL01

The working week in Quality Management

The working week in Quality Management (SUDCL01) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using The working week in Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone.

SUDCL01-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — The working week in Quality Management
SUDCL01-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — The working week in Quality Management
SUDCL01-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — The working week in Quality Management
SUDCL01-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — The working week in Quality Management
SUDCL01-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — The working week in Quality Management
SUDCL01-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — The working week in Quality Management

30 · 300 h

SV7BE02

Evidence in Quality Management

Evidence in Quality Management (SV7BE02) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using Evidence in Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone.

SV7BE02-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — Evidence in Quality Management
SV7BE02-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — Evidence in Quality Management
SV7BE02-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — Evidence in Quality Management
SV7BE02-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — Evidence in Quality Management
SV7BE02-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — Evidence in Quality Management
SV7BE02-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — Evidence in Quality Management

30 · 300 h

SUXBT03

The system around Quality Management

The system around Quality Management (SUXBT03) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using The system around Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone.

SUXBT03-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — The system around Quality Management
SUXBT03-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — The system around Quality Management
SUXBT03-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — The system around Quality Management
SUXBT03-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — The system around Quality Management
SUXBT03-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — The system around Quality Management
SUXBT03-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — The system around Quality Management

30 · 300 h

Stage 2 — 900 hours

Code	Course	Credits · hours
STJDS04	Rules that bind Quality Management Rules that bind Quality Management (STJDS04) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using Rules that bind Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. STJDS04-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — Rules that bind Quality Management STJDS04-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — Rules that bind Quality Management STJDS04-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — Rules that bind Quality Management STJDS04-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — Rules that bind Quality Management STJDS04-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — Rules that bind Quality Management STJDS04-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — Rules that bind Quality Management	30 · 300 h
ST9E605	A manager's brief in Quality Management A manager's brief in Quality Management (ST9E605) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using A manager's brief in Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. ST9E605-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — A manager's brief in Quality Management ST9E605-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — A manager's brief in Quality Management ST9E605-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — A manager's brief in Quality Management ST9E605-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — A manager's brief in Quality Management ST9E605-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — A manager's brief in Quality Management ST9E605-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — A manager's brief in Quality Management	30 · 300 h
SU3D006	Capstone in Quality Management Capstone in Quality Management (SU3D006) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using Capstone in Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone. SU3D006-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — Capstone in Quality Management SU3D006-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — Capstone in Quality Management SU3D006-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — Capstone in Quality Management SU3D006-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — Capstone in Quality Management SU3D006-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — Capstone in Quality Management SU3D006-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — Capstone in Quality Management	30 · 300 h

Code

Course

Credits · hours

STJDS04

Rules that bind Quality Management

Rules that bind Quality Management (STJDS04) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using Rules that bind Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone.

STJDS04-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — Rules that bind Quality Management
STJDS04-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — Rules that bind Quality Management
STJDS04-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — Rules that bind Quality Management
STJDS04-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — Rules that bind Quality Management
STJDS04-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — Rules that bind Quality Management
STJDS04-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — Rules that bind Quality Management

30 · 300 h

ST9E605

A manager's brief in Quality Management

A manager's brief in Quality Management (ST9E605) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using A manager's brief in Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone.

ST9E605-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — A manager's brief in Quality Management
ST9E605-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — A manager's brief in Quality Management
ST9E605-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — A manager's brief in Quality Management
ST9E605-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — A manager's brief in Quality Management
ST9E605-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — A manager's brief in Quality Management
ST9E605-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — A manager's brief in Quality Management

30 · 300 h

SU3D006

Capstone in Quality Management

Capstone in Quality Management (SU3D006) is a 30-credit course on MSc Quality Management, with 300 notional learning hours. By the end, students can diagnose one organisation and carry a decision through to a recommendation, using Capstone in Quality Management as the working context rather than a generic management example. The course is taught in three movements. First, students establish the terms and the decision the course is about. Second, they apply the method to a case, dataset, text, or design and compare it with a weaker alternative. Third, they revise the work after feedback and state what the conclusion cannot support. Preparation uses a case, a short financial extract, and a stakeholder note. Seminar time is for the decision, not for reading the materials aloud. Assessment is a consulting brief a manager could use. A pass requires a clear method, evidence a marker can check, and an explicit limit. Credit is not awarded for summary alone.

SU3D006-M1 · Position, rivals, and the choice in front of the organisation — Capstone in Quality Management
SU3D006-M2 · A financial result and the operational cause — Capstone in Quality Management
SU3D006-M3 · The decision, the team, resistance, and the plan — Capstone in Quality Management
SU3D006-M4 · Stakeholders and what they can block — Capstone in Quality Management
SU3D006-M5 · Ethics and the limit of the recommendation — Capstone in Quality Management
SU3D006-M6 · A consulting brief: problem, evidence, recommendation, defence — Capstone in Quality Management

30 · 300 h

Career Paths

Quality Management lead
Quality Management analyst
Quality Management coordinator
Advisor, Quality Management
Project officer, Quality Management

Programme Highlights

180 credits · 1,800 notional hours · 6 courses
Course hours add up to the programme total
ماجستير إدارة الجودة
The award is fully online. There is no campus to attend.

Assessment

Modules are assessed through a published mix of coursework, applied projects, and examinations. Exam windows are announced in advance so students in other time zones are not forced into overnight sittings. Alternative arrangements are available where documented.

Admission requirements

Academic entry

A bachelor's degree from a recognised institution, or equivalent professional standing considered by admissions

Documents

A statement of about 500 words on why this award fits your work
Two references, academic or professional
A CV

Programme questions

How long is the MSc Quality Management?

The published duration is 4 Semesters (2 Years). Teaching language: English. Actual time-to-complete depends on mode and any recognised prior learning.

Can I study this from my country?

You may study this award fully online from your country, or — where published — on campus at IUC. Online study does not require a student visa. Campus study may.

What does it cost?

Degree tuition for this award is published as £0 / tuition-free on the online pathway. Examination or administrative fees may apply at checkout — never an annual tuition invoice. Check the Fees page for any extras.

What are the entry requirements?

Requirements are grouped on this page (academic, English, documents). Equivalent qualifications are considered. English may be waived after prior English-medium study.

How is the programme assessed?

Assessment is typically a mix of coursework, projects, and examinations. Doctoral awards include a thesis or dissertation and an oral examination. Details sit in the programme specification and module outlines.

Will this award be recognised where I live?

Recognition of the award for local employment, professional licence, or ministry attestation is decided by your employer or regulator. Imperial University in Cairo publishes verification pages for certificates. We do not claim automatic equivalence in every country.

How do I apply?

Start an application on this website. Progress is saved from the first step. Admissions: admissions@iucairo.co.uk.

Recognised & Accredited

Ready to begin?MSc Quality Management

Apply now